Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (15340)	1/7/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: Rico Staris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

>>>You appear to be saying that Sayers was lying. Uh-oh. Attorneys are officers of the court, among other things; telling lies about cases in which they're involved is a problem.<<<< And OJ is NOT GUILTY! . . . . . . . . . You are one stupid OLD FART!.... . . . . . . OF COURSE YOU DON'T KNOW THAT YET.......<WINK><WINK> . . . . Oh Well

To: Janice Shell who wrote (15340)	1/7/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

"You appear to be saying that Sayers was lying. Uh-oh. Attorneys are officers of the court, among other things; telling lies about cases in which they're involved is a problem. Could get 'em disbarred. Now why would Sayers take that sort of chance? I can't think of a single reason." yes janice, my point dear, they can get disbarred, unless they are not a member of the bar. can you give us sayers credentials? when did he pass the bar? do you have a number he can be reached at? i must thank you dear for you cooperation in providing as much information as you have & hope will indulge me just a little more. as far as edit the posts dear , many notice you responded to this wireless wonk 'before' he completed his post, your response was to a blank post dear, but it matters not. it was not me who claims this sayer guy is lying, guy who says he his lying has your posts though. spider

To: Janice Shell who wrote (15340)	1/7/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

"Sayers also offered an account of a conversation he had with an exasperated Qualey. (Hint: the cause of Qualey's exasperation was not Sayers or WellRich.)" janice dear you are telling us that this sayers guy told you & jeffrey, known internet penny stock bashers, "an account of a conversation " he had with a supposed defendant in a case you claim he is currently litigating? & now you publically post of this "conversation" on this thread? this lawyer, as are you & jeffrey, very interesting to say least! can you give us credentials & phone number of this lawyer who behaves so in case that is supposedly continued? spider