Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (26549)	1/7/1999 6:52:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I don't defend your guy Huffington. Never liked him in fact. But it's irrelevent. Dipy has been bitching about republican congressmen that preach morals AND commit adultery. BOTH ELEMENTS MUST BE PRESENT. Then he said if one republican preaches morals and a DIFFERENT one commits adultery, that shows hypocrisy. Then when I point out Clinton's friends in the dem party, he goes back to the AND statement again. Then he can't find anyone. You want to talk about democrats that are not is office, how about Gary Studds, who preached about taking care "the children" at the same time as he was sleeping with his male 16 yr old page. But again, it's irrelevent, because all this bitching is about the comtemporary situation.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (26549)	1/7/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Ain't it funny to see the Republicans now saying, "Well, we never said anything about character or morals or family values!" :-) Why, just the other day, "lack of morals" was a big, huge, humongous thing, and GOP election ads kept drilling that into the people again and again and again. But now, it all has been reduced to a pathetic, "Well, he didn't lie about it under oath!" What a sorry crowd of disgusting hypocrites!

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (26549)	1/8/1999 8:15:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Now that was a stupid post even for you Michelle. How exactly does the fact that Mr. Huffington was shall we say, ambiguous, about his sexual orientation reflect negatively on Mrs. Huffington and make her a liar? Other than the fact that you disagree with her and therefore she must be evil? JLA