SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Final Frontier - Online Remote Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TFF who wrote (6158)1/7/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: AlienTech  Respond to of 12617
 
>>E*trade must salivate at the numbers some Day Traders do each day.
<<

Yea and the day traders would sure drop off the volatility in a lot of stocks as most of them will go broke in a few weeks using ETurd.



To: TFF who wrote (6158)1/8/1999 8:11:00 AM
From: TFF  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 12617
 
Day of Reckoning for Day-Trading Firms?
Business Week

Regulators, alleging fraud and other problems, are cracking down on the industry

The lure of quick profits from skyrocketing tech stocks was too much for Isaac Belbel and John L. Powell. The two friends, one an ex-broker and the other a former restaurant owner, spent the last year in front of computers in Watertown, Mass., at a branch office of All-Tech Investment Group Inc. They were executing rapid-fire trades on a daily basis in companies such as Dell Computer, Amazon.com, and K-tel. Their goal: to make money on small price swings in these volatile stocks.

But the duo's stock market thrill ride ended in disaster. They lost at least $200,000 trading for themselves and five friends, say Massachusetts securities regulators. On Dec. 10, Massachusetts regulators charged Belbel and Powell with trading without a license--regulators said they needed it because the two men were trading for others. Regulators also threw the book at All-Tech for numerous securities violations, including fraud. ''All-Tech's Watertown office was a vipers' nest,'' complains Mathew J. Nestor, chief of enforcement for the Massachusetts Securities Div. Belbel declined to return phone calls. And both Powell's attorney, William Bulger Jr., and All-Tech Chief Executive Harvey I. Houtkin strongly deny the charges.

All-Tech, based in Montvale, N.J., is just one of dozens of day-trading firms being targeted in a crackdown by state regulators (table, page 90). The crackdown may result in significant industry reforms. Philip A. Feigin, executive director of the North American Securities Administrators Assn. (NASAA), which represents state securities regulators, says there are widespread problems among day-trading firms. He is spearheading a national task force to study the industry, with an eye toward stricter enforcement. ''They have taken the art of losing money and turned it into a science,'' he says.

The day-trading industry began in 1988, when federal regulators changed stock-trading rules to allow individual investors to execute trades on NASDAQ more easily. It really took off just a few years ago with proliferation of firms using new software designed to execute split-second trading. Individuals sign on with day-trading firms, which are licensed by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and have special software that provides information on the flow of orders and instant access to NASDAQ stocks. The day traders monitor small price movements in active stocks, trying to profit from changes of as little as a quarter or an eighth of a percentage point. Individuals execute as many as 100 trades daily and usually close out their positions before the end of the day. The firms make money from the commissions, usually 2 cents to 3 cents a share. Day traders are a small subset of online traders.

But day traders play a major role in a critical segment of the market--the 100 most actively traded NASDAQ stocks. James Lee, president of the industry's trade group, the Electronic Trading Assn., says there are about 40 day-trading firms nationwide, but eight control 85% of the market. All told, the industry represents 12% to 15% of NASDAQ's daily volume, he claims.

Some of these firms are promoting electronic day trading as a way to make a lot of money. But industry regulators are keeping a close watch on those marketing claims, which sometimes hide the risks, says Mary L. Schapiro, president of NASD Regulation Inc., NASD's enforcement unit. Schapiro also vows to be tough on promoters who ''suggest that day trading is 'the best entertainment since television'''--a claim All-Tech's Houtkin made in a radio interview last fall.

PROFIT WATCH. Regulators are also discussing whether day-trading firms need to take more responsibility for their clients' trading. Under current rules, brokers must make sure that the investments they recommend, such as stocks, futures, or options, are suitable for their clients' financial position. Now, with firms pushing day trading for novice investors with limited capital, ''there's a question where a suitability requirement exists when a company is recommending a trading style rather than a product,'' Schapiro says. No new rules are yet on the table, but ''we [regulators] talk about it a lot,'' she adds.

David Schellenberger, a Massachusetts enforcement official who heads NASAA's task force on day trading, says he wants to find out if any day traders actually make a profit. In one enforcement case brought against a Massachusetts branch of now defunct Houston day-trading firm Block Trading Inc., the state found that 67 of 68 customers lost money. ''If no one is making a profit day trading, that raises a disclosure issue,'' says Schellenberger.

State regulators have been aggressively going after firms that make misleading and unrealistic advertising claims. They are also concerned about the financial stability of such firms, and whether regulations adequately protect consumers and the markets.

Feigin says the capitalization of many day-trading firms is too thin. The problem is compounded because some firms offer day traders no-money-down loans or rely heavily on margin from clearinghouses, he says. Feigin's worry: Trading revenues may not cover losses in the event of a market downturn.

Day traders rely heavily on margin to leverage their capital. They typically start with $50,000 to $100,000 of their own money and double it by borrowing on margin. Many traders also rely on loans from family or friends, signing partnership agreements that spell out how the parties will split profits and losses. Some states, including Massachusetts and Texas, claim that these arrangements violate state laws that require individuals who trade for others to register as investment advisers. But the Electronic Traders Assn. claims that without the agreements, the industry would be ''seriously undermined.''

GYRATIONS. Not surprisingly, the established Wall Street houses are the upstart day traders' sharpest critics. And tensions are running high because of the extraordinary valuations of Internet stocks that have left most professional investors on the sidelines. Muriel F. Siebert, chairman of discount broker Muriel Siebert & Co., believes day traders are responsible for irrational volatility in stocks, including her firm's own, and that the industry should be subject to stricter licensing rules. ''You can't let these people go wild,'' she adds.

Merrill Lynch & Co. Vice-Chairman John L. Steffens believes day trading has made a casino out of the market. He says day trading has caused problems for Merrill customers, since it is hard for Merrill to execute orders for a stock that is gyrating wildly. And he says day trading is a good way to lose money. ''I think this day trading and the kind of volatility it has created is not good for anybody. It's not a heck of a lot different than betting on red or black.'' Houtkin contends that the big brokers feel threatened by competition, now that the small guys have the same access to the markets that they do.

Houtkin may have a point. But unless the day-trading firms clean up their act, the regulators are likely to do it for them.

Day Trading: The Trouble Spots
INFINITUM MANAGEMENT
JAN. 6, 1999 Texas orders firm to stop day trading while unregistered in Texas and fines principal and eight others $44,000

BLOCK TRADING
DEC. 17, 1998 Wisconsin regulators allege Block sold an unregistered franchise to an investor

OCT. 19, 1998 Massachusetts regulators allege fraud, unlawful loan scheme, and encouragement of unregistered investment advisory activity in a branch office

ALL-TECH INVESTMENT GROUP
DEC. 10, 1998 Massachusetts regulators allege deceptive marketing, fraud, forgery, and the establishment of fictitious accounts in a branch office

BRIGHT TRADING
NOV. 9, 1998 Massachusetts regulators allege an office operated a day-trading business wiThout registering as a broker-dealer

GENERIC TRADING ASSOCIATES
MAY 27, 1998 Colorado regulators impose limitations On advertising

EXCHANGE HOUSE
SEPT. 30, 1997 Texas regulators settle complaint that individuals executed day trades for others without registering with state