SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marc chatman who wrote (34500)1/8/1999 9:28:00 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Respond to of 95453
 
WSJ reported on that trade today.....they were calls in the amounts reported which then lead to more call buying on follow up speculation... mainly in march 60's the most active call option traded.... the march 55 put however, was the most active put. One trader was quoted as saying he was skeptical the trades were 100% bullish, but probably a hedge against another position in the sector.... his basis: "he couldn't imagine anyone would risk so much money on such a risky position"

Joel



To: marc chatman who wrote (34500)1/8/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: SkyDart  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Nope. It was definitely futures per Faber on CNBC

Inside Information is stronger than any other indicator.

Remember "Wall Street" and Gecko...."Only bet on sure things. Tell me something I don't already know, Bud".

If you know of any signal stronger than inside information, I'm all ears...

Jeff