SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gauguin who wrote (16302)1/8/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
I thought we discussed a solution to this wet-mail problem, Mr Carpenter. Of course, if you do correct it you will end a source of amusement for the rest of us.



To: Gauguin who wrote (16302)1/8/1999 8:38:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
OK, Gauguin, see, here is how it works. I told you I am a trial lawyer, right? Anyway, you have to go to jury duty, unless you qualify for an exemption. I am not going to tell you how to get out of it, I think it is your civic duty to do it. But, I will tell you what it means to have someone like you on a jury, and maybe it won't seem so bad.

It is the selection process I want to focus on briefly. Let's assume that the prospective trial is a criminal matter. You may well be the most intelligent, educated person in the group of people from which the jury is to be selected (called a venire). I don't know what you look like, but if I were defending a criminal, I would probably want you on the jury, not because I thought you'd be lenient, but because I thought you would be fair.

If I were representing a plaintiff, which is what I do, I would definitely want you on my jury, because I am sure that I would feel rapport just looking at you, that you were kind, and interested, and decent.

I can't tell you how awful it is, to have worked months, years, on a case, to have a lot of money riding on it, something that makes a real difference to the plaintiff's life, and draw a jury that just looks at you like a row of crash-test dummies.

The system can't work fairly, buddy, without people like you.<eom>



To: Gauguin who wrote (16302)1/8/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
Gaugs, ignore Coby. She's a trial lawyer. You can't trust 'em. Just do what I did when the thyroid had my nerves tweaked so high I couldn't handle being in the jury room: sneak out at lunch. 'Course that didn't work for me, and I got fined 'cuz I didn't know at the time why my nerves were frazzled and couldn't provide the judge with a Doctor's Note proving I was properly wigged out. The bastard. But then, he undoubtedly was a trial lawyer....