SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (45208)1/8/1999 8:04:00 PM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 1581874
 
Kevin,

>Re:Don't forget the .35u wafers early in the year in your >calculations.

Kevin a super detailed model is probably not worth the effort.
As an example any wafer starts after 12/1 are unlikely to have yielded any revenue in parts. So at 15-16K wafer/mo range at year end that is also significant.

The key is that with full up Fab 25 and 30 coming on AMD has plenty of capacity even with piss poor yields.

The real issues is wether they can ramp up the speed grades to ramp the average ASP to $150 or so.

If they can then we are looking at a $100 stock.
If they can't then we are still in reasonable shape as $1.0 earning for FY 99 should be a lock even if average ASP's drop to $75-80.

I see limited downsides and pretty significant upsides in the stock.
And with Intel fighting with Compaq,IBM,HP on server patent issues this could present a real opportunity to AMD with the K7-if they perform.

Regards,

Kash



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (45208)1/8/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1581874
 
Re: ": "We know yields were bad and got a lot better. So by end of 98 they may have been yielding in the 160 DPW range."

Sorry to disappoint you but 160DPW for a wafer with 300+ die is still very poor yield.

EP