Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: whiskeyjack who wrote (11336)	1/8/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: stanley new	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Excuse me for jumping in, but have any of you seen what you consider some realistic projections for stock price based on the possibilities? I apologize for not reading very far back on this thread, but my system is just too slow tonight. Thanks for any responses regarding potential share price! SLN

To: whiskeyjack who wrote (11336)	1/8/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: .Trev	Respond to of 26850

No it's the opposite. The N. Shore intersections are deeper according to Sopuie. Teevee or somebody suggested that means they might have to spend some time drillin to try to find where the N. Shore sheet comes to surface or nearly As usual we have to assume if it were easy somebody else would have done it. Cheers

To: whiskeyjack who wrote (11336)	1/8/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: teevee	Respond to of 26850

Hi, Its been a while since we have heard from you. I can only assume that the unreported depth for hole 19 on the north shore suggests/infers that there is an updip direction-otherwise, why else would Winspear be using a drill to locate the upside subcrop edge of the cone sheet if it is there-hoping to find it so they can take a third sample here. It should be reasonable to assume that they have the CF results for the north shore and that they must be at least as good as the NW peninsula, or why bother wanting to take a bulk there? Also, a bulk sample taken elsewhere from the NW peninsula would go along ways in convincing the "market" that the cone sheet is one monster of a deposit(maybe these results when they come will help move the stock from $20 to $50 or more?). As for Vaughn's comments on the magnetics and the crackle fault, I haven't seen those maps so I can't comment. Sorry. If the magnetics etc. are presented in Vancouver at the Cordilleran Roundup (are you listening RT?) I will have a look and give you my two cents worth when I return. It would also be great if Winspear would give us a look at the diamonds from the two 100 tonne bulk samples, however, I'm sure they do not want anyone and especially DeBeers, seeing the diamonds as the size distribution would tell all-on the other hand, maybe it would move the share price up quickly.. teevee