SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Fowler who wrote (33743)1/8/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Mark,

This was nothing more than a Classic ' PICKUP & SNARE ' move by the MM's. I have seen a lot of these but this was the most obvious. The reason it was so obvious is because of all the new small investors that have been drawn to AMZN to make their fortune. Their problem and undoing was most that buy a stock like AMZN do so with their brilliant Stop Loss Order in hand. Come the last hour, the MM's look up, see all these stops and knock them out like bowling pins. That is not the only dynamic that manifest itself here. It is like a four point play, while they are knocking out the stops, the new little short experts start selling like crazy. Now the MM's are set for earnings blowout next with YHOO. They have picked up relatively cheaper shares and have snared all the shorts they wanted.

From the porch,

Voltaire



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (33743)1/8/1999 10:30:00 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Mark>>I actually think<<
Please don't think. It hurts if you think too much. What I think is, that You and William have had your day, and the buzzards are circling in.
In the next month or two, don't you think it would be wise for Glenn to have shown up. For the first time?
Be honest here, if you can!



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (33743)1/8/1999 10:37:00 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Mark>>Amzn closed at top of support.<<
Are you wearing a jock strap?



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (33743)1/8/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Are you saying that 160 is 'support'? Why? Cause it spent one whole day above 160?