Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: t2 who wrote (14036)	1/9/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: ed	Respond to of 74651

In the US , if the lawers like , they can file a suit against any companies for over charge , and ask the companies to give back the money . The problem is what is the definition of over charge, Who set the standard about whats % of profit companies should make so that it will not be counted as over charge ? Is $130K for Mercede Benze S560 over charge comparing to Honda which sold for $20K ? Then should Mecede return all the over charged money back to the consumers ? Or is Honda overcharg the customers comparing to Dodge Colt which sold for less than $13000 ? Then should Honda return the over charged money to the consumers ? All these are just nonsense . It is the market force to make the decision. These lawyers just like to find something to file suit against to keep their jobs . SO IF MICROSOFT GAVE AWAY ITS PRODUCTS , THE GOVERNMENT COMPLAINED MICROSOFT DUMP ITS PRODUCTS TO THE MARKET, AND IF MICROSOFT CHARGE ITS CUSTOMES ON THE PRODUCTS< THE GOVERNMENT COMPLAINS MICROSOFT OVER CHARGE THE CUSTOMERS> SO NO MATTER WHAT MICROSOFT IS DOING < THE GOVRNMENT ALWAYS THINKS IT IS WRONG . THEN WHAT SHOULD MICROSOFT DO ? MY SUGGESTION IS CLOSING THE US OFFICE AND MOVE TO OVERSEAS WHERE THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IS BETTER WITH MORE REASONABLE BUSINESS LAW.