SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brady B. who wrote (17963)1/9/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 18444
 
That would be a very sly interpretation of "ZULU shareholders", don't you think, Brady?

The Investor's Preferred are newly-issued shares. They aren't being exchanged for existing ZULU shares. Ditto, the existing Netvest shares are shares in ESVS, not ZULU.

I guess you could stretch, and say that, if Asian Trust and Netvest ALSO happen to be ZULU shareholders, that "existing ZULU shareholders" could hold 73%.

But it's a gerrymander type of definition, don't you think? I mean, you could apply that definition if Netvest and Asian trust held only 1 share of ZULU each. It's not proportional to their holdings in ZULU.

Yea, Pat owns some ZULU, and he winds-up owning 57.3% of the new company. So "former ZULU shareholders" now own 73%. (e.g. Pat plus other holders in both companies, plus holders of ZULU shares.)

LOLOLOLOL!

No, the fact is, that the current ZULU shares will be converted into less than 20% of the resulting company's shares. That is the number that matters, not this phoney-baloney 73% number!



To: Brady B. who wrote (17963)1/9/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
No, Brady. Jon sees it as Hayton against us, not Hayton with us. Tara's whole system of Zulu destruction is anchored in this tact.