SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (27829)1/9/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Bob,

I would agree as long as the religious expression involved is private. The moment you stop the class so that a child of one religion can publicly pray, you have to give the other kids the right to walk out, which would be a bit disruptive. The only way out would be to stop the class every time any kid of any religion wanted to pray, which would certainly mean a major proliferation of prayer around test-time.

Steve



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (27829)1/9/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Bob,

I think I raised this issue once here before: religions that require their members to violate the religious freedoms of others, like Christianity and Islam, provide a very special problem in the interpretation of religious freedom. What takes precedence, your right to prosletyze or my right to maintain my religion in peace?

How do you think this should be handled?

Steve


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News