SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Randall Knight who wrote (21085)1/10/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 152472
 
I will be the first to agree with you that looking at recent performance of AMZN's share price would make one wonder about a lot of things.

What most of us will never know is -- whether or not Jeffrey Bezos (founder and "main man" at Amazon) is now thinking like Alan Greenspan -- "How do I guide a ridiculous level of a share price down before we have it collapse suddenly and disrupt things severely ?"

I assume AMZN would find it very difficult to use their stock now as "currency" in a buyout of another company. No one would dare accept it as payment, especially if they were prohibited from selling the AMZN stock for even a (relatively) short period of time.

Jon.



To: Randall Knight who wrote (21085)1/11/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: J. Kerner  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
So AMZN is a better company than QCOM? I think that the statement above is valid only over a long term scenario. Look at RPM for example. Who will make more money in the next twenty years, owners of AMZN or owners of QCOM?

I don't think we need to wait 20 years to realize that the AMZN shareholders who have held through the entire move have made far more than QCOM owners could ever dream of.