SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (34143)1/10/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
By Jennifer Westhoven
NEW YORK, Jan 8 (Reuters) - Wall Street veterans are
wondering; When is E-nough enough?
Internet mania continued on Wall Street Friday and analysts
are asking how ugly the landing might be if this high-wire act
loses its balance.
But even the doomsayers are unwilling to call a top.
On the whole, more analysts are shifting to pejoratives
like "mania" and drawing parallels to historical crashes.
Michael Farr, president of Farr, Miller & Washington, a fund
based in Washington, compared the latest buying surge to 19th
century land rushes.
"You're placing the stakes on land that may bear no crops.
This is a very expensive way to take these kinds of chances,"
Farr said.
On Friday, cyber stocks still had the power to astound.
Broadcast.com Inc. <BCST.O> jumped $65.50 to $197.50. Nasdaq
briefly halted trading, but the company said it had no comment,
which many took as a signal that there was no material news
driving the gains.
The IIX <.IIX>, an American Stock Exchange index of
internet stocks, hit a new high. It has more than doubled since
October 8, a day chartists mark as an important low.
Amazon.com Inc. <AMZN.O>, the Internet retailer, is up more
than six-fold since then. So is E*Trade Group Inc. <EGRP.O>,
the online trading firm, while online auctioneer eBay Inc.
<EBAY.is up more than tenfold. And these are just a few.
The gains have invited constant comparisons to Charles
Mackay's 1841 book "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the
Madness of Crowds", which holds that reason can sometimes leave
financial markets, with disastrous consequences.
But if and when a denouement comes, when "e-nough" is
enough, analysts do not think that a downturn would affect the
U.S. economy or spoil the stock market like "Tulip Mania".
A craze for tulips had the 17th century Dutch betting on
options on tulip bulbs until a crash in prices nearly strangled
the Netherland's Golden Age economy.
"Even if they were toreally tag them and (the speculative
stocks) fall 25-30 percent, would it cripple the rest of the
market? No," said Ralph Acampora, a technical strategist at
Prudential Securities.
"It might slow us down and cause a correction, but this
frenzy is in one sector, not across the board. I would not lump
this together with the entire market."
Gary Campbell, chief investment officer at Commerce
Investment Management Group in St Louis, Mo., said that, with
few funds heavily invested in Internet stocks, a downturn would
hurt but the effect would be limited.
"The biggest risk is to those individuals who have too much
of their portfolio in this sector," he said, but added that he
thinks most fund managers are steering clear.
"Who wants to get the call from Morningstar when they ask,
'What were you thinking?'" he said.
Even with the conventional wisdom looking ahead to a
correction, plenty of analysts see room on the upside.
"I think they're going higher," said Acampora., but he
limits his recommendations to a few blue-chip high techs,
including Microsoft Corp. <MSFT.O>, Intel Corp. <INTC.O> and
Dell Computer Corp. <DELL.O>.
Premature bets that the sector would topple have left
investors with empty pockets.
"I thought (Amazon) was overvalued...loaded up on puts and
became road kill -- to put it mildly," one investor confessed
on a Silicon Investor web site.



REUTERS
Rtr 18:00 01-08-99

Copyright 1999, Reuters News Service



To: GST who wrote (34143)1/10/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: Otis  Respond to of 164684
 
I trade the stock many times a day. I just happen to get a great short price off and held it over the weekend. I just wanted to get SI consensus. I won't be holding one way or another.