SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (42140)1/11/1999 9:04:00 AM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
I'm not saying that R-DRAM is a given but it sure looks that way. My main point, however, is that I don't seem to hear much discussion of it here when trying to assess the future prospects of the memory industry.

Especially since MU could play a major role in it and reap nice profits.

MileHigh



To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (42140)1/11/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: PAinvestor  Respond to of 53903
 
Hi Fred, what seems different these days is the fact that INTC has to actually persuade MU by giving them a whole load of money to ensure that their roadmap will be adhered to. INTC has to pay MU on their terms, MU have stated they will use the money as they see fit. Their priorities right now are shrinking to 0.18 and integrating the TXN facilities. Definitely a break from the past.

Other major chip makers have the ability to produce Rambus, NEC already supplies Rambus chips to Nintendo. The problem is that it is alot more expensive to make than SDRAM and coming out of years of red ink, I can understand their reluctance. MU is in the same position, they are still ramping up their Synchronous based DRAM which will probably continue to meet the needs of the bulk of the PC market well into 2000. I think the reason you don't hear much about Rambus on this thread is that is really not as important a priority for MU right as, say, the integration of the TXN facilities.