SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E*Trade (NYSE:ET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nord who wrote (4189)1/11/1999 7:43:00 AM
From: Jerry Miller  Respond to of 13953
 
Nord,

"they didn't each buy a 25% stake in a vacuum."

i think you're right on it.
it certainly makes a lot of sense.

here's something else.
E*Trade in Swahili ?

biz.yahoo.com



To: nord who wrote (4189)1/11/1999 9:03:00 AM
From: Eric Lee Smith  Respond to of 13953
 
Gomez has a bullish article about the E*Trade/Goldman Virago deal:

gomez.com

Till later,

E



To: nord who wrote (4189)9/27/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: scanshift  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13953
 
The Archipelago Stock Exchange application shows that E Trade paid 2 1/2 times what Goldman Sachs did for the same stake in the Archipelago ECN when they both got involved in early January. I went back to the post you put up on January 11, and see that you have their press release from January 7th attached discussing the equal stakes but no financial terms were released at that time.

Does anyone have any idea why E Trade would pay 25 million and Goldman Sachs would only pay 10 million for the same stake? The 25 million and 10 million dollar figures were also pointed out in the following Redherring.com story.

herring.com