Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Dayton Mining (DAY) on TSE & AMEX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Handshake™ who wrote (430)	1/11/1999 10:05:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 568

IT's the MO, particularly you guys who I'm now convinced are shills that come over here hype MDIN, by making a case against DAY. No one on SI should really know the merits of that law suit just because someone says something don't make it true. Had you stayed on the MDIN thread and bashed day I wouldn't have been convinced of the MO. All this apologetic patronizing grabage followed by a BUT, or However , IS very much the way most politicians try to operate , and I have verytoleranceolarance for it. It's called Adversative ideas, two propositions united in opposition to each other by conjunctions such as "but" "yet" "however" or "although", this form of logic falls to the limits of reasoning by deduction, when you mix the two and you have a probable dilemma. Dilemma ie ; disjoin or expressing an alternative between two opposites as a conclusion, ( instead of as a premise to lead to a conclusion) the major premise consist of a disjunctive proposition, and the minor premise consist of conditional "but" type propositions, each of which takes one member of the disjunction, and from it deduces a conclusion to undermine the opposite, this is a complex Adversative argument. ie rhetoric.. ---------------- The merits or discredits of the Law suit is a matter for the courts, to put it on trial here is at best disingenuous, We can reasonable assume that a MDIN crew got run off of some property in Chile, and that DAY was in some way involved. ( THAT's IT ) we know MDIN filed a suite here in the STATES , for what happened in Chile ? I don't believe in that kind of crap, or the people who try to pull it. The matter is for the courts in Chile and that's that. ---------------- Because of all this I did visit the MDIN home page, and looked at their posted so called "financial" report. It's Make up was so unorthodox, I could see at a glance the SEC would never accept such a rag tag filing. If they are attempting to be on the up and up the least they could do is prepare a close match to a 10Q, unless they intend to stay a BB:OTC for as long as they last. --------------- Last as for the shill part I visited your profile , as well as that of some others on MDIN, and the dedication of posts to the MIDN thread is very peculiar , not normal at all for a regular SI posters; who will post on a much more variety of threads; one can only conclude you only own one stock, or your a paid shill to hype MDIN. I will add if that is your goal, you are shooting yourself in the foot by trying to build up MDIN by bashing DAY, most people are not dumb enough to buy into that modus operandi. ----------------- I've said all this before , and could go on and on, but I do have some other investments that need my attention more that this, if any thing you yourself have convinced me MDIN is a scam, even if that wasn't your intention. Jim