Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (2345)	1/11/1999 1:55:00 PM
From: Klaus Brandt	Respond to of 5143

Chuca A mutual friend of ours send me a few dirt samples taken next to maxams properties. Activation labs in Ancaster On. found only 0.005 p/B.I was warned they only do SFA. One sample had 1.67 OPT . I know what yuo are saying best for 99 Klaus

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (2345)	1/11/1999 8:55:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 5143

Subsequent to this mornings discussion on Low Assay values and relationship to Leached Ore Tests and Fractions as done by Xral who we have seen befor with their MMI methods at Maxam. I just noticed CHIP info here also uses Hewlett and Xral...the thoughts here are showing some low assays in relation to higher on Chlorine Leaches...and Concentrates' Franctions also. lscap.com lscap.com lscap.com >SIERRA MINERAL MANAGEMENT > > > R.F. Hewlett > $$$$N. China Lake, Ste. #@@@ > XXXXgecBBBt, CA 93XXX > > (XX7 Fax (VVV > > Feb 04, 1998 > > > > > Dear Paul, > > I am in receipt of fire assays and chlorine leach results from three > registered assay/geochemical laboratories; > > 1. ACT-Skyline (Tucson, AZ) [Fire Assay-Lead Collection] > > 2. Jacobs Assay Office (Tucson, AZ) [Fire Assay-Lead > Collection] > > 3. XRAL LABS (Toronot, Canada) [Chlorine Leach/Fire Assay > with Silver Inquart] > > One-ton of bulk-samples were previously taken from the COCHISE > COUNTY, AZ precious metal deposit and concentrated at the Black > Canyon Mill. I previously reported a preliminary estime of the ehad > ore grade computed from partial assay results (Feb. 04, 1998). This > report is an update with only the themral neutron activation results > and acid leaching geochemistry trace elements still outstanding. > > On the following page, all assays received to date are posted. Notice > that the XRAL chlorine leach has produced higher precious metal > values than the fire assays--which is to be expected. The next phase of > this metallurgical testing is to conduct bulk chlorine/bromine leaches. > > CONCENTRATE PRODUCT > WGT > Weighted Concentrate Grade > (Troy Ounces/Ton) > > > GOLD > SILVER > Magnetics > Table 1-Cut #1 > Table 2-Cut #1 > Table 2-Cut #2 > Cone Concentrate > 14.00# > 10.25# > 7.50# > 23.00# > 131.50# > 186.25# > 0.117 > 2.428 > 1.494 > 0.103 > 10.212 > 0.365 > 159.550 > 35.790 > 153.800 > 25.164 > 42.126 > 53.006 > weighted average > grades > > > > HEAD ORE GRADE: > > GOLD > 0.365 > 2000/186.25 > = 0.034 troy ounces GOLD/ton head > > > > FURTHER UPDATES WILL FOLLOW > > RICHARD F. HEWLETT > > ABOVE FROM a PR at CHIP:bb : chuca marsh <bondee@ma.ultranet.com> >>Subject: TYPO below at 0.016 should be 0.16 DC Plasma) assay up on web >> >>>Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 21:17:59 -0500 >>>To: CG1998 >>>From: chuca marsh <bondee@ma.ultranet.com> >>>Subject: assay up on web >>> >>>WE have the Equivalant as a BD( Ha Ha!) sign off as far AS I am concermed...at CG 1997 for 3,500 of claims that eventually assayed by Don Jordan at .18 at GPGI locations and at ???at Dale Runyon Locations, the Standrd OLD tech Fire Assay came in at ...assay AZ State Registered Stamp..Jacobs of Tucson at #-1 thru #X9 with a top assay at 0.006 ( not 0.06 ) and a low registered value of 0.002 ( not 0.02 ) so with that said, X2 samples registered at 0.001 OR less GOLD and latter on we got...0.016 in DC Plasma ( thus at 0.03 OPT SFA we have a FIND and a HALF) Congrats all! We did it!!! Chuca >>>>Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 00:48:15 >>>>From: Big JOHN >>>>To: >>>>Subject: assay up on web >>>> >>>>http://thewww.com/website/wma8/assay7.jpg SEE assay7.jpg PASS IT ON. THANKS BIG JOHN >>>> >>>> At 09:31 PM 4/8/98 EDT, you wrote: >Don't know about you but sure am real glad we had that FA done. Chuca...Now...as far as I am concerned I am glad they DID SFAs...the fact that 20 registered UNDER MEANs some must be OVER, IMHO...awaiting the Biggues! Now...I want the proof, also. They doublechecked JL if I know Mike, they did a verrification, why it is not released...I wonder. C2 What County??? ?