Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Senior who wrote (5704)	1/11/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78715

2 value plays. AJX and TFFI. AJX - book value $8.25, eps $1, current px $9.50 TFFI - book value .29, current px .875. Clients Revlon, Colgate Palmolive, Coca Cola, and Netrogena. Full reporting, good revenue base. Summary of my DD at... Subject 24741 Any input - neg or pos - appreciated.

To: Paul Senior who wrote (5704)	1/11/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78715

Paul, >can you, just for the fun of it, come up with a shorting > rule: Do you see it from the IOM chart? No, I don't. Increased volume? But that just comes from the splits. Decreased volume at the very top? Hmm, I need a better chart than Yahoo's... Actually with 20/20 hindsight, the time to short IOM and PRST was their last split. Splits are great for high flyers, but bad for broken high flyers. Good luck Jurgis - if I could do TA, I'd be rich ;-)

To: Paul Senior who wrote (5704)	1/11/1999 12:50:00 PM
From: Bob Rudd	Respond to of 78715

Paul: The most obvious common chart characteristic I see [PRST, IOM, AMZN] is an extended parabolic rise..this was a contributing factor to my short, but I agree that I have no clue on projecting the ultimate top.