SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Societe Anonyme/No Pennies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brett Fleischman who wrote (41859)1/11/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: ilh1  Respond to of 119973
 
STREET WISE by Sam Jaffe

IS CITY SEARCH A NET STOCK THAT
DESERVES TO SOAR?

at first glance, the recent IPO of TicketMaster Online/City Search (TMCS), known more commonly as City Search, looks like just another Internet stock jacked up by the feeding frenzy of short-term traders. It was released on the night of Dec. 2 for $12 a pop. The first trade the next morning was for $60. It soon settled at around $40, where it has rested since. But that still gives it a price-to-sales ratio of 195, about 40 times that of the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

That's seemingly enough to prompt any long-term investor to avoid the stock -- as is the case with many Internet stocks that rest on a foundation of hype. But a closer examination of City Search's business model makes it stand out from the crowd as a company that could Possibly be worth its sky-high valuation.

To understand why City Search might turn a profit someday, you must first understand the structure of the company. The old City Search was a local entertainment and business guide site serving about a dozen cities, with plans to expand to many more. Last summer, it merged with TicketMaster Online, which is the Web arm of ticket distributor TicketMaster. TicketMaster (which itself is owned by USA Networks) now owns about 62% of the newly public company.

SIGNED AND SEALED. City Search has such an appealing future because of its relationship with its largest shareholder. Thanks to a signed and sealed contract, City Search has the online rights to sell all TicketMaster tickets. Not only that, "we have the perpetual and exclusive and irrevocable rights to online tickets [via TicketMaster]," says Charles Conn, the CEO of City Search. "We recognize the revenue, we reimburse the costs to TicketMaster, and then we get 50% of the profits." Half isn't bad when you consider that the margins in this business are pretty high, as much as 25% gross, thanks to TicketMaster's dominant market share -- which is believed to range from 60% to 80%.

And that market share isn't going away soon. The ticket business, though seemingly simple, is protected by some of the highest barriers to entry you'll find in any industry. In fact, TicketMaster has been sued by several companies in the past over allegations of monopolistic practices -- to no avail so far. So TicketMaster remains about the closest thing there is to a monopoly that isn't being investigated by the Justice Dept. It sells tickets everywhere in the country for every conceivable large event, from rock concerts to sports events to Broadway shows. Barriers to entry are all but invisible for most Web concerns. So when a company such as City Search is insulated against competition, it's worth an investor's attention.

Doubly delightful for City Search is that ticket-selling is perfectly suited to the Net. There's no bulky product with high mailing costs to be shipped to the customer. And there's endless room on a Web site in which to describe an event. City Search will soon be rolling out advanced Virtual Reality Markup Language (VRML) technology that lets you view a theater in three dimensions from the section in which you'll be sitting.

Already, 5% of all TicketMaster sales are done online, and that number is rising quickly. "The growth in online sales for tickets has been remarkable," says Paul Cook, the manager of the Munder NetNet fund (MNNAX), which currently doesn't own shares in TMCS. "It's a great company with great management, but it's price is a little too high for me now," Cook adds.

BLUES CLUB BOON. Another opportunity for City Search is the Web's ability to do for niche businesses what it does for big businesses, at a low cost. The one area of the ticket-selling business that isn't already owned by TicketMaster is tickets to small bars and clubs. City Search's specialty is guiding people to such venues, and now it has a way to sell tickets to them. Say you own a blues club and until now you've sold all your tickets at your box office. City Search can build you a Web page, link that page to its larger Web site, and then sell tickets to your events online.

The company is currently getting 40% of its revenues from selling tickets, another 40% from selling companies Web pages on its City Search sites, and 20% from advertising. It expects to maintain that revenue mix.

Of course, City Search does have its inherent risks. It could suffer, for instance, if parent company TicketMaster loses its hold on the market, whether from new competition or via the courtroom: Some antitrust suits against Ticketmaster are still being litigated.

As for competitors, they're huge: America Online (AOL) has its own city-guide service called Digital Cities, as does Microsoft with its Sidewalk site, both of which are also trying to sell tickets. But neither has the leg up that City Search does, thanks to its relationship with TicketMaster. So both AOL and Microsoft will rely heavily on advertising to generate revenue.

And then, of course, there's the Internet stock bubble to worry about. When it pops, most Internet companies may go down at once, not just the ones that don't deserve to fly high. Of course, when the bubble does burst, it could be an opportune time to buy Internet companies that have bright futures. And one of them could be City Search.

Jaffe writes about the markets for Business Week Online



To: Brett Fleischman who wrote (41859)1/11/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: Yoav Chudnoff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119973
 
onsl and lcos should do very well tommorow
dbcc wish I had the money for that too



To: Brett Fleischman who wrote (41859)1/11/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: Trader J  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 119973
 
Brett - Gaps are not what they used to be. I hope you are right but there is much to much time between now and then. Today's rally was very broad based across all Inets. That will make it difficult for an across the board gap. I agree that DBCC will have an ok gap but I have my money on NAVR.

Played DBCC earlier in the week and to me, NAVR represents a much better value here. They own more of their IPO that DBCC does, trades at 1/2 the price and is 1/3 the float. The only negative, if you can call it that, is the fact that the NetRadio IPO still has not been announced. This gives two potential pieces of news to pop the stock and some nice volatility until that time to sell the highs and buy the dips.

Good luck.

TJ



To: Brett Fleischman who wrote (41859)1/11/1999 5:14:00 PM
From: QuietWon  Respond to of 119973
 
I'll have a some Net/Net related stocks over next few weeks - unfortunately I won't have access on-line access from Wed onward and will miss the MKTW ipo



To: Brett Fleischman who wrote (41859)1/11/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: QuietWon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119973
 
JEB, if you're on this board, go to IMCL bd - just spoke with IMCL and 2 points for claification:

1. crucial thing is being permitted ENTER phase III which =
a) Phase II proving that it works +
b) submitting a plan for phase III

2. IMCL has proven that it works and is awaiting approval to on it's plan of experiment for Phase III

#2. is the key thing and I would hold a position in the stock for FDA approval.

Note: comparison to Entremed, Entremed could't prove their worked. IMCL is clearly way closer in my opinion