Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Exall Resources/Glimmer Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James N. Wilson who wrote (795)	1/12/1999 4:41:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1319

I think they are seeking an arbitration concerning the ruling. The thing is still in process. Don't ask me who is wrong and right. All I know is some people who are close to it and seek a financial interest are fairly confident that it will come out on Glimmer's side. EC<:-}

To: James N. Wilson who wrote (795)	1/12/1999 7:01:00 AM
From: Winzer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1319

James, There are enough clues floating around to suggest that they could be talking (with associated gag order in effect). I would hasten to interject that if they are indeed talking, there COULD be three parties in the room (GME/EXL & ?). From the SAS map along the PD fault, there are enough potential JV partners or take overers to require a computer to keep track of the all the possibilities. Wishful thinking? What does your calculations say about the break-up value at 50/50 or 56/44, @1 mln ounces & 2 mln ounces James? I should give them the number to Ritchie Brothers Auction (yes they had the website first)! Cheers Winzer