Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (27186)	1/12/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

In the last several weeks, Clinton's just about spent the Social Security 'surplus' which he proudly proclaimed to be guarding. Just about every day, he is announcing a $ 1 billion or $ 10 billion or $ 100 billion spending program. I'm glad I no longer have to pay FICA taxes to support the clown.

To: Bill who wrote (27186)	1/12/1999 9:56:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<The man has no respect for himself or the dignity of his office. By his continued lies, the president demonstrates he has no respect for the Senate.>> As evidenced by his dependants on this thread, there is no limit to the lengths they will go to, to enable bill clinton to continue. I don't have a lot of confidence in what I've seen coming out of the Senate so far. The label (left wing liberal) stood for bringing down corruption in government thirty years ago. They seemed like wackos who had no capacity to effect change at first, but the awareness of corruption they brought about caused a cultural revolution of sorts. Now the left wing liberals have been infiltrated with the same type of characters who embodied the right guard thirty years ago. They have become the desperate and dependant machinery who must defend unrestricted corruption to maintain their miserable existence. This too will change, but probably not by this mock trial.

To: Bill who wrote (27186)	1/12/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

The problem for Mr. Clinton, however, is that much less intimate behavior -- for example, the caress of a breast -- was included in the deposition's definition of sex. The problem with all these Radical attacks is they never give the complete answer. For Clinton's actions to fit the definition he gave it would also have to be proved that he intended to arouse Monica by his actions. Trying to get to this level of detail in order prove perjury is like blaming him for saying Good Morning when he was clearly having a bad day. TP