SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mooter775 who wrote (7023)1/12/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: FMK  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
More on the 1800.
o: +Greg Smith (4896 )
From: +I. N. Vester
Wednesday, Nov 11 1998 11:59PM ET
Reply # of 7022

Greg Smith PLEASE, don't expect everyone on this
board to pamper you by answering you on every
tiny detail. The numbers make sense for 1800
batteries - your own calculations indicated
that this is consistent with the $/wH, etc
and add up to a burn rate of $4M/quarter or
so. Lev may have actually said 'cells' I
don't know. If he did he clearly mispoke.

We've done the calculations and are very
comfortable with the CEO's statement that
they can break even (on a $ basis) by
running 1 line for 1 shift/day. That's
why lots of money is coming into the stock.

There are some inconsistencies in what the
Korean press reported and what you heard
from Lev. There were reports earlier
from the korean press that hanil/valence
would start producing this summer. Never
take anything too seriously from the korean
trade press. Literal accuracy does not
seem to be a requirement over there.

Lev's lack of concern about Jan 27 does not
imply he's ignorant about important facts.
He's not paying attention to that date, not
because he's dumb, but because he knows it
does not matter. I.e. he's weeks away from
signing a contract but he could not tell you
that on the call, as he carefully explained.

Look at the chart - a lot of millions have been
going into this stock. The smart money is
comming in not going out. Go ahead and
obsess all you want before deciding, but please
try not to take up so much band width insisting
that everybody help you get unconfused. You gotta
help yourself a bit too.

good luck!



To: mooter775 who wrote (7023)1/12/1999 9:59:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Respond to of 27311
 
mooter, your statement sounds rational, yet my experience in launching new products and establishing a commanding position in a market which is already "served", is that you have to be twice as good at half the price (VBG). That is one of the reasons I do not think that such high selling prices will create rapid market penetration, and expect a rational person like Lev seems to be, to establish itself rapidly in the field with aggressive pricing. Of course, he can take the approach of taking first the cream of the market at premium prices (lower volume) and then increase penetration by lowering prices. In any event, gross margins of 60% seemed high. We will have to see a quarter or two of production to get a handle on this.

Zeev