SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (45575)1/12/1999 11:36:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1573857
 
Kevin, <He has a problem with AMD selling 66 MHz rated chips.>
There is a significant body of fake K6 chips,
right after AMD had a breakthrough in yields
and performance. After that AMD has changed
ink-printed markings to etched marks, which are
much harder to counterfeit.
I think Europe is infested, as usual, with
this bootleg scum to much higher extent,
therefore Tom's problems.

Regards,
- Ali



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (45575)1/12/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1573857
 
<2) He has a problem with AMD selling 66 MHz rated chips. Doesn't Intel do that with the Celeron? Aren't there a lot of people out there with socket 7 mobos that don't support 100 MHz bus speeds that might want a faster processor with SIMD? Moreover, it's not like AMD is selling these chips and claiming they work at 100 MHz.>

The difference is that the K6-2 really needs that 100 MHz bus in order to run at its fullest potential. (Then again, overclockers will say the same thing about the Celeron 300A.) Also, it's not like every socket 7 motherboard can support the K6-2. The K6-2 isn't the K6-Overdrive, you know.

<Sounds like someone at AMD snubbed Tom and he's annoyed. So he continues to kiss Intel's *ss.>

It seems that Tom's mood changes with the wind. Just several months ago, he was worshipping at the altar of K7 and suggesting that investors sell off their Intel shares and buy AMD. Those who heeded his advice would have missed Intel's recent run-up from the 90's into the 130's, so it's a good thing that Tom isn't considered a stock guru.

Tenchusatsu



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (45575)1/12/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1573857
 
Tom Pabst is a well known cry baby.