Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27302)	1/12/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 67261

It was no investment. It was a naked bribe.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27302)	1/12/1999 2:28:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

That was a bribe from Tysons foods. They maintained several accounts, and marked all the winning trades to her.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27302)	1/12/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Anyone who thinks the fix wasn't in on that one isn't living in the real world.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27302)	1/14/1999 1:46:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Didn't you get to see the video of her at the start of it? Her first statement was the she traded all by herself with the help of the wall street Journal. When more evidence came out, and many said her trading success would be a zillion to one impossible, she then publicly stated that she had received advice from Tyson and indicated that decisions were not always her own as originally stated. Then when some trading records were uncovered and certain trades didn't fit available legal contracts, and it was revealed that the trading firm had been busted for just the sort of illegal activity alleged here, she stated flatly that she had no idea what the trades were about and it was totally handled by others. ABC news played the clips back to back to back. What a crime that media everywhere didn't HEADLINE these incredibly contradictory statements. You are either blissfully unaware that by her own statements she MUST be a liar concerning this matter, or you don't give a hoot about obvious crime when committed by a Democrat. Of course, that Pres. Clinton nearly saved himself 850,000 grand in the Jones case by committing perjury and slandering Jones and other women involved doesn't seem to bother you either! So transparent are you- you are not a feminist, just a partisan. Just ask Camille Paglia.