Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan Crawley who wrote (17624)	1/12/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: Zanga56	Respond to of 27307

.21

To: Jan Crawley who wrote (17624)	1/12/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: Dr. David Gleitman	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 27307

Awfully quiet on this thread. What was the estimate, 16 cents vs 21 cents. Sounds good to me. David

To: Jan Crawley who wrote (17624)	1/12/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: tonyt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27307

>I found Yhoo's management to be more responsible than Amzn's. >Two for one split!! (not 3for1 or 5for1) What is the purpose of a split? If not for the purpose of getting the price to a point where it is more liquid, then what purpose? A 2/1 gets YHOO to 200/shr, not much os a difference than 400 as far as liquidity is concerned. Management should want to see the price at 60 - 70 (as a comparison, I expect to see MSFT split 2/1 soon). I actually see a 2/1 as irresponsible as they will have to split 2/1 again very soon to get the price where it should be. The split should have been 5/1 or at least 4/1.