SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ftth who wrote (2726)1/12/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Dave, Believe it or not, the only time that I can recall a single carrier entity being responsible for guaranteeing end to end performance, and being able to do something about it, was when there was a single Bell System. Today's service level agreements simply don't cut it in many cases.

And even then, the data rates were much lower, and there was always the main frame channel at the customer location to contend with. That's a good example. The parallel to that would be your own PC bus speed. Who is to say that if you subscribed to a 6.3 or a 12.6 Mb/s DSL service, that your own machine could even keep up with it? Then we would have the guy at the other end blaming the telco. [!?!]

You're right, this is like a value judgement, and as such it would be in the bit bucket of the beholder. [g]

Regards, Frank C.



To: ftth who wrote (2726)1/13/1999 8:16:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Dave, I tend to think long haul, I should have qualified my last statement with

>>the only time that I can recall a single carrier entity being
responsible for guaranteeing end to end performance, where long distances [interexchange] and multiple regionals are involved.