Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (1689)	1/13/1999 10:16:00 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4710

How about That good of a anyways and myriad of? and under the What Happened to the T? heading, two more entries: picshur frackshur

To: Edwarda who wrote (1689)	1/13/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: Jack Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4710

Edwarda: I hope pronunciation isn't off topic on this thread. The discussions which might appear are indeed complex or endless. I guess I started it with my peeve of "EK-cetera". Anyway, regarding your examples: aks for ask? nucular for nuclear? I agree that "nucular" is terrible. President Carter (a "nucular" engineer, I am told) used it all the time, to my great consternation. "Aks" for ask is common among speakers of our very own black English vernacular, but it does have an archaic precedent. I believe old English "aksian" or something similar, is the root of the word which in modern English becomes "ask". I think it is even used as late as Chaucer and came into our Southern American dialect in some way. If I have the time I'll look it up. Clearly "aks" is unacceptable now, but those who have learned it this way in childhood find it almost impossible to change, and at least they have some historical precedent for this dialectical usage. I have a good feel for Southern dialect, both white and black varieties, and we could have an entire thread just devoted to these forms of our wonderful language. Jack