Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (16982)	1/13/1999 9:17:00 AM
From: Timoteo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18691

Bob-Agreed. Brazil will be the excuse;nothing has really changed fundamentally since the last corrrection except sentiment.

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (16982)	1/13/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18691

> the internuts represent a couple hundred billion of market cap. One thing to remember is that the "market cap" of most of these companies is really only theoretical. The vast majority of the shares are held by original investors or insiders who are not selling. Most of those gains have never been recognized by their owners, even where the owners are large institutions. What this means is that the number of shares subject to margin calls or catastrophic REALIZED losses represents only a fraction of the reported "market cap." Most of the inside holders would still be well ahead of the stocks dropped 75%. Of course, this just highlights the fact that if those shares suddenly DID come to market, the price drop-off would be tremendous, as supply suddenly exceeded demand. The current valuations for internet stocks is kind of like the valuation of a bottle of water in the desert. It's worth whatever you've got to spend on it. But that doesn't mean you value the entirety of the world's oceans based on the same marginal cost. The traditional idea of a "market cap" presumes that a high percentage of the shares are traded openly, that supply and demand can balance out, and that all the various types of "squeezes" don't exist. It is pretty useless in determining the value of a company like AMZN, where purchasers are effectively bidding on the price of a drop of water in the desert. (With one key difference. The liklihood of a desert suddenly being flooded is almost infinitesmal. However, any of the big investors in any one of these internuts could suddenly decide to sell. Wouldn't be too good for people who bought on margin at the top, but even all the "public" shareholders together are a drop in the bucket, representing a small fraction of the theoretical "market cap".) mg