Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : pamc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Parnell who wrote (158)	1/13/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: Crossy	Respond to of 570

Parnell, seems to be that others accused him of posting misleading info on other stocks and thus he was expelled. Even if the allegations were true I still bother him because he always was straightforward to us PAMC watchers. However this needn't be the case, just look what a company like ITEX did. They were unable to file the 10Q and 10K - were subsequently delisted from Nasdaq but still found the "guts" to engage litigation against an online poster who seemed to have pointed out those weaknesses. Seems that posters & investors ALSO DO NEED A PROTECTION AGAINST FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS not only the companies. Companies got them - which I think is just and fair - becuase old law status was a joke IMHO - the PSL reform was a major success in this area. But posters & investors need the same. One suit with just enough big a sum of "claims" and you can shut up forever.... best wishes CROSSY BTW: try this: click on "port_mgr" - name and read his last postings. You'll see he posted some apologies..