SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (27621)1/13/1999 11:28:00 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 67261
 
I suspect these are the same people who refuse to cooperate with the "scientific" polls.

They tend to attract mostly those people who are disgruntled and are better educated.



To: Les H who wrote (27621)1/13/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I assume you jest in your endorsement of internet polls, Les. My view would concur with those of James Bowers, expressed in Message 6905142 . Disgruntled, yes. Better educated? Dubious, at least as a cause for the anti-Clinton skew.



To: Les H who wrote (27621)1/13/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
re: Disgruntled and better educated

I want to point out that the internet seems to have a lot more men than women. On SI I think it is 10:1, seriously. Women hate the repulicans right now. How many women have come on this thread in favor vs. against Clinton. Its easily 4:1 in support of Clinton. Also, women are more affected by the abortion crap spewing out of the right wing nutcase bunker.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News