Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (4106)	1/13/1999 8:01:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32882

Tim My guess is NOPE and you are outta here ;-)

To: Tim Luke who wrote (4106)	1/13/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32882

Tim You know I can't say I agree about this $2000 dollar thing. However, the handling of the TMEX question should be addressed...but you know SI and their police tactics. A whole thread is erased that complains about TMEX..and it had to be done by Brad Dryer since Bob couldn't do it due to the number of posts.....but TMEX can call people whores and "out" people with their real names and other misc and asundry items. Patrick Slevin has a classic post from burrito head talking about paying for ...ahem....female protrusions when meeting with a reporter that worked for Jim Cramer... but I don't have the link. i have seen far worse things on SI than the thread that complained about TMEX - the burrito head. When interviewed I hope you make the uneven policing tactics known. Good luck but the real people that lose are the ones that interact with you. It won't make any difference to the 64 million dollar Dryers (or whatever the current sum happens to be). I guess you can start your own little operation and sooner or later you can be the 64 million dollar King who makes the rules but doesn't follow them ;-)