SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: .Trev who wrote (11847)1/13/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
I understand the statistical argument but do you think the market is going to like the fact that the drilling may not encounter a large stone?

I also agree that the company should publish all the info so that the experts on this thread can analyze and digest, but when is long enough? Could they postpone releasing any results until they get to the 6000 ton sample?

Other people have suggested that I go down to the local concrete plant but it was, I think, to get fitted for cement boots not to review aggregate distribution charts.



To: .Trev who wrote (11847)1/14/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: freddy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
RE: CF RESULTS
The testing done on 2x250kg samples taken 250m apart should give a pretty good fingerprint of the surface area of the NW Dyke.Could you tell me how representative a drill hole sample taken 600m downdip would be if the tested amount was only 10kg.How much variance could you see meter by meter or is kimberlite that consistant/uniform over a broad area?Is there an error factor applied to a small sample?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News