SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27741)1/13/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
>Stupid nutcase! The allegation has been made on a "sworn affidavit". You know what that means, eh, do you, cretin?!<

Oh, a "sworn affidavit". That settles it then. Dear me, Dipysnot, you really haven't a clue. We are in the age of Clinton, where affidavits mean very little. An affidavit was the thing Monica filed when she claimed not to have had sex with Clinton in any fashion whatever. Dipy you will do anything to defend your pimp, you will even believe a sworn affidavit simply because it is a sworn affidavit, completely ignoring the source of this sworn affidavit, namely, a disgruntled ex-wife in dire straits who is so low in character that she derives her sustenance from a filthy pimp.

Perhaps the allegations against Barr are true. It matters to me not at all either way. What is certainly true is that your pimp has "floored" no one. He is a fat pornographic sicko and you rally behind his fat sick butt, you Sodomite. It is also true that I am done with you, having now extracted my pound of flesh from a filthy liberal. It is also true that you are Larry Flynt's whore, and I ought to have known better to transmit even a character in your direction.

What was your unit, where did you serve, you friggin scumpot?



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27741)1/13/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
An affidavit which was purchased for cash. Has about as much credibility as the one Monica filed. Your name should be dopy. JLA



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27741)1/13/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 67261
 
This from "Dipy", another anonymous poster that Schuh says has no credibility.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27741)1/14/1999 3:21:00 PM
From: cody andre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Perjury ...?!



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27741)1/14/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Dipy, even assuming, and Barr denies nothing, that the sworn allegation is true, it simply does not mean he committed perjury. Unlike clinton, in court Barr refused to lie- he refused to answer. NO perjury whatever could have taken place. And as Flynt himself pointed out, the jury is allowed to consider the failure to answer as an indication of guilt.