SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VVUS: VIVUS INC. (NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Edderd who wrote (17746)1/13/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: Curt Whitaker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23519
 
Be serious. You are not going to refuse a Rx to a patient who has been using Viagra without incident and with success.

Really? With our lawsuit-happy society? I would tend to think every doctor would think twice before blindly prescribing anything with risk involved - risk to their financial well-being.

Curt



To: Edderd who wrote (17746)1/13/1999 7:58:00 PM
From: VLAD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23519
 
Edderd,

Carefull now. It's that attitude that's going to get a lot of mds into trouble. Just because the patient didn't have a coronary yet doesn't mean it won't happen in the future.

There is a pool of men out there on Viagra who each day continue to have progressive CAD. Eventually they will have their coronary. Their lawyer will blame you for never checking closely into their CV status. You're defense of "he was doing just fine on Viagra before he had the heart attack" won't wash very well. Your patients are dynamic living beings. Just because things were fine today doesn't mean they will be fine tomorrow.

Complacency is a prelude to disaster.



To: Edderd who wrote (17746)1/13/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: VLAD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23519
 
Ed,

I did not say I would refuse such a patient. I said it would be wise to review all patient files and require an in person recheck on potential "at risk" patients as opposed to phoning in a new script.