SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (45804)1/13/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573008
 
Scumbria,

<By the end of this year they will be in the business and workstation market.>

Everyone is entitled to their dreams. I wouldn't want to spoil yours...after all, it's all you have.

<AMD is steadily eating away at Intel's market share. >

AMD has gained some unit market share at the low margin, low end. Intel still has virtually all of the profit share, even in this segment. AMD investors never have been able to understand the difference between market share expressed in terms of units vs. market share expressed in terms of profit.

<And they are making money.>

Although this is a foreign concept to most AMD investors, they have had brief spells (a quarter or two in a row) of profits in the past. Unfortunately, they don't last long. Enjoy it while you can <g>.

FF



To: Scumbria who wrote (45804)1/13/1999 8:32:00 PM
From: MONACO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573008
 
Forget about it, AMD just can't deliver the goods, no big OEM can afford to take a chance of them coming up short, they are destined to provide chips for the low end of the market and with Intel as their competitor they will always show low or no margin....in this game you got to be able to produce and produce consistently...M



To: Scumbria who wrote (45804)1/14/1999 12:26:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573008
 
Scumbria - Re: " Of course, none of this is important compared to three cents worth of miscalculation by some analysts. "

And just what would you have said if Intel MISSED the analysts' expectations by 3 cents instead of walloping them by 12 cents ?

Paul