SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: antibash who wrote (15779)1/13/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 26163
 
Antibash, please tell us the latest at Abracel.

- Jeff



To: antibash who wrote (15779)1/13/1999 8:35:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
So, Harvard grad, exactly what did Sylver mean when he wrote Janice Shell is "in the employee [sic] of the Defendants..."

Choose one:
a) Janice is an employee of the Defendants
b) Janice is employed by the Defendants
c) Janice is in the employ of the Defendants
d) All of the above because they mean the same damn thing
e) I, Antibash, have the IQ of a cockroach on Raid, and I... can you repeat the question?

- Jeff



To: antibash who wrote (15779)1/13/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 26163
 
Hey Anti, it just occurred to me, Sylver's affidavit that Janice Shell is "in the employee [sic] of the Defendants..." was the BIG news you've been hinting about since last October-- when the Fortune article featuring Janice was published! I guess the "sh*t really hit the fan" didn't it. ROFLMAO! Three months of waiting... ahaha hahahaahahhahahaha!

- Jeff

P.S. Don't forget to tell me about Abracel ;^)