Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DWalmsley who wrote (7583)	1/13/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Sure Thing	Respond to of 90042

I'll chip some money in the Dawg Fund if Tim will act as LPOA on dawg's account and trade the fund for one year. Cheers, - Sure Thing -

To: DWalmsley who wrote (7583)	1/13/1999 9:38:00 PM
From: MARK C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

DAOU - Fair amount of risk but better than average upside potential. Do your DD and see what you think. I have no position as yet but am looking to enter on a pullback if one comes. Stock at 8 7/32 and held up great today. MarkC.

To: DWalmsley who wrote (7583)	1/13/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: backman	Respond to of 90042

count me in...given all that tim's done, perhaps glenn to find the time to be the treasurer...i'd trust either of 'em, and i love the idea of tim being 'dawg's mentor/monitor (could be a movie.."you've got profits") david s

To: DWalmsley who wrote (7583)	1/13/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: Norwegie	Respond to of 90042

I would be happy to chip in to the "Get the Dawg in the Market" fund. I'll keep watching and hoping that a fund can be established. LurkyLoo

To: DWalmsley who wrote (7583)	1/14/1999 1:12:00 AM
From: Fredman	Respond to of 90042

your last sentence: my response is, 'wouldn't we all ?'. I KNEW I wouldn't win any popularity contests with what i said, but that's how I feel, and work. I am sure as hell not going to bite my tongue just to avoid saying something (some) people might not want to hear. As far as admonishing people off of SI for the reasons Tim cited, i'm all for it. But I don't agree with trying to force somebody to 'donate' to a certain Individual for whatever reason, unless the person's house burns down or something. But what really got me is when he said basically if he didn't get his way, he'd not say nice things about SI in some upcoming magazine articles. THAT is stupid. His following was built on SI, and HE chooses to let it be is undoing: that's up to him, not us nor SI. I just think Tim would be a lot happier with exclusive control of his own website. He could build one for 10G easily. And if somebody said something on his website he didn't like, he can do what he likes and deal with a lawyer and all the 'free speech' crap people hide behind. I don't like all of it, but I have to live with it, and so does everybody else.