SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (45882)1/14/1999 1:47:00 AM
From: Yougang Xiao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572946
 
WSJ's take on Q4:

Price-Cutting Spurred by Competition
Weakens Profits at Chip Maker AMD

By DEAN TAKAHASHI
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s fiscal fourth-quarter profit fell short of
analysts' estimates, as heavy price cutting and a production snag took a toll
on chip sales.

The Sunnyvale, Calif., chip maker reported net income for the period
ended Dec. 27 of $22.3 million, or 15 cents a diluted share, compared
with a loss of $12.3 million, or nine cents a share, a year earlier.

Analysts' consensus estimate was 18 cents a share, according to First Call,
and some analysts expected more.

Revenue was $788.8 million, up a healthy 29% from $613.2 million a year
earlier. The company said it sold about 5.5 million K6 microprocessors
during the quarter, up from 3.7 million units sold in the third period. But
AMD, facing stiff competition from Intel Corp., Santa Clara, Calif.,
experienced falling prices.

C.B. Lee, an analyst at Sutro & Co. in San Francisco, estimated AMD's
average selling price was $88 in the fourth quarter, compared with $100 in
the third quarter. "Their large customers appear to be extracting big price
concessions," Mr. Lee said.

AMD released its results after stock markets closed. Its shares closed at
$27.75, down $3.75, or nearly 12%, in New York Stock Exchange
composite trading Wednesday, and changed hands in after-hours trading
at $27.625, according to Instinet Inc.

AMD Chief Executive W.J. "Jerry" Sanders III said in a conference call
with analysts a design flaw prevented the company from producing more
of its highest speed 400-megahertz K6-2 microprocessors. The company
fixed the design, and the improvements are expected to take effect in
February.

Mr. Sanders said AMD's nonmicroprocessor businesses lost money in the
quarter, and nonmicroprocessor sales should be flat in the current first
quarter. He said AMD expects to produce 5.5 million microprocessors in
the first quarter, but he hopes to get better prices because more of the
chips will run at 400 megahertz or higher.

In the first quarter, any revenue improvement will depend on whether
AMD can get higher prices, but Mr. Lee at Sutro said that will be difficult
considering Intel's determination to cut prices and retake retail sales from
AMD. AMD hopes to gain share on Intel by closing the gap in
performance as it launches a faster K6-3 chip during the first quarter and
then a next generation K7 chip at midyear.

For all of 1998, AMD reported a loss of $103.9 million, or 72 cents a
share, compared with a loss of $21.1 million, or 15 cents a share a year
earlier. Revenue was $2.54 billion, up 7.6% from $2.36 billion a year
earlier. For the year, AMD shipped 13.5 million microprocessors. Mr.
Sanders said AMD expects to sell 20 million to 25 million
microprocessors in 1999.



To: Yousef who wrote (45882)1/14/1999 1:54:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572946
 
Yousef - RE: "Intel's process is at 1.8V"

Don't .25 desktop PIIs and Celerons run at 2.0 volts? AMD desktop chips up to 400 run at 2.2 volts.

Are you telling me that AMD reduced the voltage requirement of the K6-2 22% while Intel only reduced theirs 11% in comparison???