SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (27916)1/14/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I'm sure Dick Scaife thinks so. So what? You're still imagining Clintons very real crimes against the women he's brought into his life are somehow ok within Liberal philosophy because there exists some messenger who doesn't agree with said philosophy. White supremecists have nothing to do with what the President has done. The connections of Barr, et al, don't make a beans worth of difference in Clintons trial. It is truly enlightening that not a word is printed by you nor M Harris that in any way would excuse the Presidents actions. Show me he didn't try to destroy citizen Jones all on his own initiative, in and out of court, and I'll quit thinking he needs to be impeached on this evidence.

By the by, it is usually the other side that brings to light the crimes of the opposition. The founding fathers knew this. They felt it would be helpfull if both sides had power. Just as Nixon would have made it through without the existence of rabid Democrat investigators, so too Clinton suffers from attacks from the other side. Neither man is innocent! There is nothing whatever un-american nor unconstitutional about this general situation nor the bringing of these specific charges. And the messenger is indeed irrelevant. So continue to attack the messenger while failing to defend the accused worth a hoot- but you will look as silly as Nixon's defenders did in the end.