Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : USRF - Wireless Internet Access -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gold Panner who wrote (537)	1/14/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: Phatt Jake	Respond to of 956

To all: I have calls in to Loflin and brother, and will answer all technical questions in the short term. I am no RF engineer either, so i want the info to be accurate. Loflin is out of town cutting/signing a deal with yet another ISP, and Denver area deal should be released soon. $6 is not a bad place to sit for a few days, and a good time for newbies to do DD and catch next double up over $10 and onto NASDAQ!!! Phatt Jake ps- in the meantime, HYPD, innovator in the E-Commerce industry to fly up over $5 on news (todays story was reprint from 1/7/99) tomorrow or early next week....don't misss another one!!!

To: Gold Panner who wrote (537)	1/14/1999 7:13:00 PM
From: BillHoo	Respond to of 956

<<There were some valid questions brought up about the frequencies being used by USRF, does anyone have any answers or insight on what interference with things cordless phones?>> Again, bandwidth is realestate. When our military moved into Saudi Arabia with FCC approved communications equipment, they were ordered to shutdown by the Saudi Communications authority. The reason: they were interefering with various radio and communications devices that had been authorised that "real estate" by the Saudi Communications authority. Would be a shame if neighborhoods noticed greater interference from an ISP and had them dismantle their equipment or moved to a freq that required higher FCC surchcarges. -Bill_H