Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wally who wrote (10207)	1/14/1999 6:05:00 PM
From: watcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

Seems to be some FNTN parasites all over this thread. I think it humorous to see how quickly you grab your guns and come out firing. Based on the performance of the stock I think it apparent that many do not agree with you and your cohorts.

To: Wally who wrote (10207)	1/14/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 15313

If I could have a moment of serious reflection from you, are you not at all concerned that FNTN has not released any actual income and expense figures for some time, and has ignored emails from at least two people that I know of (myself and one other person I know of through PMs who refuses to post here on the topic for quite good reasons)? I have written to Alan Ross on three different occasions simply asking for an amplification of the "fiancials" released just prior to the annual meeting. You will recall they claimed they had audited 1997 and unaudited 3Q98 figures, but released only net income and four lines of balance sheet numbers. I'm certainly not going to accuse FNTN of anything shady, but I frankly can't see why they would have audited financials but not be willing to release their total sales and their expenses to shareholders. Isn't this information that shareholders in a public company, even if only a BB stock, have a right to? Is information from 1997, now a year old, so sensitive that it should be kept secret for competitive reasons? Can you think of any good reason why this information would not be made available on request?