Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27974)	1/14/1999 5:03:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

From Pristine Day Trader --- Pristine Note: The Wall Street Journal reported in its Heard on the Street column that on-line brokerage firms are plagued with problems related to customers trading internet related stocks. Many firms are even staring to contemplate the idea of not letting customers place trades in internet stocks. What does that tell us? Despite all the hoopla about how fast and far these rockets have soared, there is literally an army of people out there who have been decimated due to the illiquidity in most of these issues. Law suits against the brokerage firms are mounting by the hour, but the legal complaints have little to no merit. It frightens us to know that investors are playing these fast moving stocks without a direct SOES/ECN trading system. Not having near instantaneous confirmations, the additional liquidity of several ECNs (electronic communications networks), Nasdaq level II quotes and a direct link to the Nasdaq places traders at a distinct disadvantage even if they are playing the dull, slow moving Nasdaq stocks. Add to this the internet stocks, and those traders are flying blind. We and our in-house traders use the SOES/ECN trading system called The Executioner (www.executioner.com). It's not the only one out there but we wouldn't dare trade without it. If you don't have direct access, it's only a matter of time before you get your clocked cleaned. And it may just be one of our traders who does it.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27974)	1/14/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

He was an accessory to murder by his own definition, whatever. Sounds like he left the choice up to the woman, however. And he paid his part. Perhaps this indicates he is far more reasonable in action than in word? Yet still, I don't care if all Republicans are anti- abortion religious-right nut-cases engaging in hypocrisy. Clinton is still a woman slandering, self-serving, lying, perjuring, sexually addicted PEE WEE HERMAN PRESIDENT. And that is just the sort of image the public has of him as a man.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27974)	1/14/1999 6:36:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 67261

<<No but (if allegations are true) he was an accessory to murder by his own definition. >> But not as you vigorously defend, by the law. Also he may have paid for it, still not proven, but paid because it was a bill he owed under the law. This might have taken place before his pro life stand. Like they say in AA it takes a defining moment to change your life. Maybe this was his. Most people in AA are against drunkeness even though they were once drunks. Should we condemn them all for changing?