Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/14/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 26163

You have to do the same saying "I luv Spider & Rico" But you don't understand... we do love Spider & Rico! <sob> isn't that <sob> obvious? - Jeff

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/14/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

You're already starting off on the wrong foot. I frequently recommend stocks when I see something worth recommending. Since your basic premise is built on two falsehoods: 1) I never recommend stocks 2) Recommending stocks is some credible show of bravado …then the basis of your bet has all the intellectual reasoning required to write one of Rico's posts. Additionally, AZNT isn't an honest company. With so many other displays of dishonesty within the company, if it were later discovered that Mikey manips his stock price by paying off brokers or MMs, or any other method of maniping the price, it wouldn't surprise me. That isn't to say I know he does, right now. I simply reiterate that it wouldn't surprise me given the other misleading info he continually puts forth. So, I would be at an extreme disadvantage to accept your bet—a potentially maniped stock against an honest one. One last thing. If you really want to know what stocks I like, you could just ask me instead of being a prick about it. What's so difficult about that?

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/14/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Dave, Since you guys think this is a joke, and never have the kahoonas to recommend a stock (Chicken littles)... There is a very valid reason why I do not recommend any stocks (let alone OTC-BB issues) to other investors. Simply put, my investments are made to satisfy my personal investing goals. In my case, I happen to be a long term investor, with very few buys and almost never sell. I don't undertake the risks of shorting any stocks, and in fact have never shorted a stock in my life. I don't do options, derivatives, futures, mutual funds, bonds or anything other than investing long in stocks that meet my personal investment criteria. That's my personal viewpoint. I don't have any problem at all with anyone who invests differently from my investment philosophies. I don't even have any problems with anyone who thinks that one of my stocks is a good short candidate. I pay very scant attention to the day-to-day price movements of my investments, and re-evaluate the individual stocks every quarter, and the entire portfolio annually. I don't recommend stocks to other folks because I don't know their investment goals or their risk tolerance levels. And I can't possibly know who will read my posts, or in what time frame they might read my posts. I've heard it said on other threads that for every one alias that posts, there are more than 10 that just lurk. I can't possibly know who's lurking out there and may purchase a stock just because at one point I said it was a good investment. Some of the stocks I invest in are quite risky (and haven't fared very well over the last couple of years). But I don't go hyping them on the threads in hopes of pushing the price up so that I can escape somewhat intact. My mistakes are mine and mine alone. I take responsibility for what I post, and for what I invest in. I particularly despise posters that hype stocks of dubious value. These same aliases almost never discuss the risks inherent in investing in these companies. That's why I'm on this thread. Way too much hype, and very little acknowledging the risks involved. KJC

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/14/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

Why the hell should we "put up or shut up" or play your silly manipulative games at all? You say you think the stock's going up. I assume you mean (ROFLMAO!!) that you think it's a good company. We've explained quite exhaustively why we think it isn't. You've contributed nothing to the discussion except for hostile or sullen posts, and inane cheerleading. Way to go, Dave. And hey. I was right about MTEI, and quite a few other things, wasn't I? Seems some people never learn.

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/16/1999 9:07:00 PM
From: DSPetry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Since Mr. Ulrich was the only one with a Backbone & Kahoonas replying to my little wager... Here's a little tally for the end of this week. Bills Picks (+4.9% CSCO- Nice move, CVIA,IPTY,NICEY) Nice gain for a few days Daves picks (+18.2% AZNT & TCBG) Now...should I sell, or hold for another 18% next week :) To bad no one actually took the bet...would have been fun to watch. Dave Message 7291689

To: DSPetry who wrote (15958)	1/29/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

For the period between close of 1/14 and close of 1/29, I have: Ticker: End price: Start price: %change: AZNT 1.218 1.19 + 2.35% IPTY 6.312 4.38 + 44.11% ______________________________ “I bet that AZNT has a larger % Gain between now & 1/29/99 4pm, than any stock you pick…($5 and under, no IPOs)” #reply-7291689 Of course, it was only a "for-fun" thing, so forget the digicam. You were generous enough to let me keep IPTY (CVIA didn't fare so well, for the time period). Your TCBG did really well, I notice (+70%). Best of luck to both us.