Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28009)	1/14/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Another dopy comment. Do you have any idea what constitutes normal prosecutorial tactics? Of course not because you haven't seen it on TV. But you are very good at labeling Starr a Nazi, etc, because you don't like the result he obtained, which is to show BC for what he is, a high-toned piece of hypocritical white trash. JLA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28009)	1/14/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Here's another ending... ...tactics were not abusive or unusual in the United States of America as governed by Bill Clinton and the Democratic Congress in 1994. After all, who was it who signed and passed the law in 1994 to change the Federal rules of evidence to specifically give the plaintiff in a harassment lawsuit the upper hand regarding the discovery of a defendant's sexual history? Hint... it wasn't the Nazis... In general, forgetting about Clinton for a moment, do you agree with the concept that a plaintiff in a sexual harassment lawsuit is entitled to discovery of defendant's workplace-related sexual history (even if consensual)?