Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WINR-Secure Banking to Global Internet Gaming & E-Commerce -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Provocateur who wrote (3918)	1/14/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: Seer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6545

Prov, I did notice. Maybe because it's only for a sports-booking site and not casino they pay half??.Or maybe the transaction fee is higher accordingly.

To: Provocateur who wrote (3918)	1/14/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: icedog	Respond to of 6545

Thanks Prov, That's much a better looking company. Tom

To: Provocateur who wrote (3918)	1/14/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Daevious	Respond to of 6545

Not sure what to make of Codee's link. It appears to be a free, personal web site on Geocities. It was interesting to look through it, but I have to say there's not a lot of substance there (imo). I'd guess it's a personal site put up by one of their "volunteer staff." Don't know exactly what volunteer staff means, but interBet seems to make use of enthusiastic patrons the way AOL and Compuserve had (still have?) volunteers to run their forums in return for a break on fees. I guess it's a positive thing that they have people who like them that much. I wouldn't read much more into it, though. Anyway, you CAN get to Codee's link from interBet's site--which was kind of a relief, to me--at interbetcasino.com, click "Links" in the left-hand frame, then "interBet Links" in the main frame (or go there directly, without the frames, at interbetcasino.com. Links to that site and a number of similar sites are there, actually. Most appear to be sites of patrons or "volunteer staff." -D

To: Provocateur who wrote (3918)	1/15/1999 3:57:00 AM
From: swedelo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6545

Mr. Provocateur, As for the $50,000 license fee. I had discussions with Mr. Skinner on this issue back in late August/early September. At that point in time he indicated that license fees would be somewhat negotiable depending on underlying circumstances...ie, discounting for multiple sites or very high traffic sites. This is a business, and having run a few myself, especially in the service industry, certian price structures should be negotiable, as every client brings a unique set of chips to the bargaining table. Also, these fees could be being split with the prospect generator (Vaudville in this case) which is very good incentive to get out there and accumulate more clients. License fees are nice, but what is going to make WINR huge is transaction volume, and obviously the more clients the more volume! Best Wishes, Swedelo