Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28044)	1/14/1999 7:56:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Is GOP chairman Jim Nicholson the next hypocrite to be dragged naked out of the ivory tower? <G> venus.beseen.com Wow! This is shaping into a very, very enjoyable spectator sport! ;-)

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28044)	1/14/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

If you really think that Bill Clinton's predicament is unique, then you are living in a dream world... thelaborletter.com Here's an example of an article (dated February 1997, well before we ever heard the name "Monica") describing the legal strategy of naming an individual executive to intimidate him and force a settlement. In the article, the strategy is likened to "terrorism". We never heard the Democrats complaining about this situation before! As I mentioned earlier, Clinton signed the law which enabled this! The diehard feminists cheered! I can't speak to your individual situation without knowing more about it. Perhaps it was before 1994 (i.e., before Clinton himself removed some of the defendant's legal protections)? My point is, this strict interpretation that you complain so loudly about (now that your hero Bill Clinton is caught up in it), was not invented by Starr or the Republicans.