SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : NeuroStock -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jay Hartzok who wrote (622)1/14/1999 8:32:00 PM
From: CatLady  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 805
 
Jay,

I was agreeing with you. My post might have been poorly worded if it didn't come across that way.

In your example, I think the effect of the missing data might be felt for even more than 15 days. It will also affect the 50-day moving average used to calculate the S/T variable. Make sense?

CL



To: Jay Hartzok who wrote (622)1/14/1999 8:58:00 PM
From: Len Giammetta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 805
 
<If I am in error on this, please enlighten me> Ok, I concede, but thinking about it, once the error makes its way to the training period, patterns are going to be recognized that are based on erroneous data, and the subsequent comparison with the current data (verify period) may result in a less than favorable prediction. The implication is that it's likely that we'll not get a valid prediction until the error is at a point prior to the training start date, three years from now.

Am I in the ball park?



To: Jay Hartzok who wrote (622)1/16/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: Len Giammetta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 805
 
I thnk I figured out that the best way to do it is place the lows in the close column