Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Position Trading in Canada -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: keith massey who wrote (450)	1/14/1999 9:41:00 PM
From: Greg R	Respond to of 2259

In actual fact, INPATHIQUE called this stock a buy at $25 on Feb. 28 as shown on the public projections page. members.home.net It continued to follow its pattern well and would probably have made the target if the Mattel merger had not come along with Mattel's poor earnings that battered Mattel, SSK and TLC by 20%. No, INPATHIQUE was not able, back in February, to forecast a merger with Mattel, nor take into account Mattel's poor earnings, since they were not part of the analysis.

To: keith massey who wrote (450)	1/14/1999 9:43:00 PM
From: StockPro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2259

Keith, sorry for butting in here but I would like to play "devil's advocate" just for the fun of it. I know nothing about Inpathique except what I read in the Usenet NewsGroups when it was being flogged for sale .... but you said ... "According to INPATHIQUE this stock was a buy at $46 ... it never got above $45 ...". While this certainly wouldn't be a valid example to show Inpathique's success ... it certainly seems no more valid an argument to show Inpathique's failure. Don't you agree? After all, according to you, the "buy" was never triggered so there was never a "false signal" in this example?