Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spots who wrote (5032)	1/15/1999
From: Zeuspaul	Respond to of 14778

I think the partition is too big for FAT16. You are right he has a FAT 32 Drive. #reply-7085821 The thread was in complete agreement on this one..the preferred format for the second drive in Clarence's NT system is FAT16. When is Clarence's two week waiting period up? He's gonna have to change the format to FAT16.(after backing up the KOT) Zeuspaul

To: Spots who wrote (5032)	1/15/1999 8:58:00 AM
From: Clarence Dodge	Respond to of 14778

Spots I think the partition is too big for FAT16. D: has a 1 gig partition thats still Fat 32. I remember the Fat 16 limit being 2 gig, has my memory failed again? You can always copy font files to a flopp OK... here are a few good free ones on the Microsoft web site. Good.. thank you Spots Clarence is definitely to blame... I've missed the last 100+ posts here and didn't know you had pulled the oc trigger..ie misfire<g>. Before Xmas Jon had in excess of 50 300a. I'll check your posts to see what your up to. Just think..Free Beer on Sean..and you'll feel better<g> That is, if he can locate me a processor (processors). That bad..wow...also I paid 102+ 20 (450mhz test) last month.You'll do a lot better now even if you have to wait a bit. Clarence