Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (46158)	1/15/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 1573004

Petz - Re: "Why am I telling you all this? Can't you figure it out yourself?" Well guess what? Old Kumar probably WAS RIGHT ! If AMD had to go to a CXT core to get a paltry 400 MHz chip - then Kumar's predictions were made LONG BEFORE AMD ever had a CXT core. And 1% WAS PROBABLY THE 400 MHz yield on the K6-2 (non CXT CORE) when KUMAR made his 1% prediction/observation. Either way, it's academic. AMD is being flushed sown the toilet bowl. And 400 MHz parts are going to be unloaded for a LOT LESS in MARCH when they come percolating out of MegaFLop 25 than they would have fetched last November and December. Wise up Petz. Buy some Intel. You'll love it. Paul